The Role Evidence Can Play in Your Texas Personal Injury Case

injured man grabbing ankle

I want to help you obtain the most favorable outcome possible in your case.

  • Contact me today for a FREE case strategy meeting.
  • Available in-person, by phone, or by video.
Brett Pritchard Law

Evidence plays a critical role in every legal case, including personal injury cases, and relevancy is a critical factor in the presentation of evidence. Better understanding the role that evidence plays in your case and how the matter of relevancy factors into this evidence can help you get a better handle on your personal injury case.

Relevant Evidence

For evidence to be relevant to your case, it must directly support a fact that is of consequence to your case. All relevant evidence is admissible – unless it is otherwise prohibited by law. Evidence that is not relevant, however, is not admissible. As such, there is a two-pronged test for determining whether the evidence in your case is admissible as relevant. The first prong deals with whether the evidence is relevant in the first place, and the second deals with whether or not the evidence is material (which means that it is important to the essence of your case). Most issues regarding relevancy relate to indirect facts that are employed to prove or support something that is circumstantial, to begin with.

For Example

Perhaps the clearest way to consider evidence is by way of example. If you, for example, were injured in a car accident and the other driver involved had a history of driving while intoxicated but had not been drinking when the accident that left you injured occurred, evidence regarding the motorist’s prior problems with drinking and driving would probably be considered irrelevant. This is because it has no bearing on the driver’s actions in relation to the accident at hand. If, on the other hand, the driver in question was under the influence when the accident that left you injured took place, evidence related to his prior drinking and driving may be deemed both relevant and admissible.

Exceptions to the Rule

Even if the evidence at hand is deemed relevant to your case, the court can deny it on other grounds. For example, if the evidence is considered more prejudicial than probative, the court is likely to deny admissibility. The term itself – more prejudicial than probative – is just legalese for saying that the evidence is more damaging than it is useful for proving the point trying to be made. The court is likely to exclude any evidence that serves to accomplish any of the following:

  • It is likely to cause unfair prejudice

  • It is likely to mislead the jury

  • It is likely to confuse the legal issue at hand

An Experienced Killeen Personal Injury Attorney Can Help

If someone else’s negligence causes you or someone you love to be injured, the path forward can be especially difficult. This is why Brett Pritchard at The Law Office of Brett H. Pritchard in Killeen, Texas, dedicates his impressive practice to protecting the rights of clients like you and to skillfully pursuing their cases’ optimal outcomes. To learn more, please do not hesitate to contact or call us at 254-501-4040 today.
Related Posts
  • Dog Bite Laws in Texas Read More
  • If You’re Injured in a Killeen Car Accident Read More
  • Back Injuries and Car Accidents Read More